{"id":465,"date":"2020-05-25T02:17:11","date_gmt":"2020-05-25T02:17:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/?p=465"},"modified":"2020-05-25T02:17:11","modified_gmt":"2020-05-25T02:17:11","slug":"who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/","title":{"rendered":"Who Got Whacked and Why?   Lifeline Program Violations"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>By: Edward A. Maldonado, Esq. May 24, 2020                                                  Coral Gables, Florida \u2013 Categories FCC Practice<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>FCC ALERT<\/strong>: FCC Eligible Telecommunications Carriers (ETC) under 47 U.S.C \u00a7 214(e) who use independent sales agents or Independent Sales Offices (ISOs) for registration and sign-up of low-income Lifeline subscribers, or, have had issues with claims submitted to USAC and NLAD anomalies are advised to review the following:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>FCC Action<\/strong>: &nbsp;NAL<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Industry<\/strong>:\u00a0 Eligible Telecom Carriers (ETC) \u2013 Lifeline Low-Income Program Subsidies (State and Federal) <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Release Date:<\/strong>&nbsp; April 2, 2020<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>DA\/FCC No.:<\/strong> FCC-20-45<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>EB File No.: <\/strong>EB-IHD-18-00027738<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>In RE<\/strong>:&nbsp; <strong><em><a href=\"https:\/\/docs.fcc.gov\/public\/attachments\/FCC-20-45A1.pdf\">In the Matter of TracFone Wireless, Inc.<\/a><\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Enforcement issues and fine<\/strong>:\u00a0 FCC proposes $6,013,000 fine against TracFone for apparently seeking Lifeline reimbursement for ineligible subscribers and fabricated subscriber data.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>What\u2019s at Issue &amp; Why<\/strong>: &nbsp;&nbsp;Licensed Common Carriers may become designated as Eligible Telecommunications Carriers (ETCs) to receive federal universal service support subsidies (USF) for providing Lifeline service to eligible low-income subscribers under 47 U.S.C \u00a7 214(e).&nbsp; This requires a grant of such qualification by a state utility commission or the FCC if the ETC is not subject to the state commission\u2019s jurisdiction.&nbsp; Once designated, an ETC may receive federal Lifeline support in an amount of up to $9.25 per month, per eligible subscribe.&nbsp; ETCs are required to pass these subsidies paid as discounts to eligible low-income consumers. &nbsp;&nbsp;Any subscriber who is not already receiving Lifeline support, has a household income of the subscriber is less than 135% of the Federal Poverty Guidelines, or is already qualified under federal assistance programs including Medicaid, Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, Supplemental Security Income, Federal Public Housing Assistance, or Veterans and Survivors Pension Benefits, is considered low-income or otherwise eligible. &nbsp;&nbsp;FCC rules prohibit a consumer, or multiple consumers, from receiving duplicate life line support if they live together as the same economic unit in the same household or at the same address. &nbsp;FCC and state rules place the responsibility for accurate and correct certification of eligible life line recipients before seeking any Life Line subsidies.&nbsp; Payments of Lifeline subsidies are managed by the Universal Service Administration Corporation (USAC), a non-for-profit delegated agent of the FCC.&nbsp; USAC administers qualified payments through the National Lifeline Accountability Database (NLAD) that receives and processes subscriber data and prevent ETCs from enrolling new subscribers without first confirming that the subscriber\u2019s household does not already receive Lifeline service.&nbsp; TracFone provides wireless Lifeline service under the SafeLink Wireless brand and offers Lifeline Support in 41 states.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>As a practical matter, ETCs often use contracted sales agents or Independent Sales Offices (ISO) to outreach in the field with prospective Lifeline subscribers.&nbsp; Sales agents and ISOs earn their compensation based on Commission or volume sales goals for eligible subscribers signed into the ETCs Lifeline services.&nbsp; Depending upon the ETC, field information of qualified Lifeline Subscribers is obtained by completed printed forms or electronically through electronic devices like tablets that upload information to be cross-checked with NLAD on a real-time or daily basis.&nbsp; &nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>&nbsp;This NAL involves the submission of fictitious accounts created by manipulating the eligibility information of existing TracFone subscribers.&nbsp; This manipulation and fabrication appears to have occurred at the ISO and sales agent level, likely to increase the commissions earned from TracFone.&nbsp; &nbsp;The FCC alleges that TracFone\u2019s sales agents apparently used household dependents\u2019 identifying information to enroll multiple members of the same household as distinct and generate additional sales sales for commission purposes. The FCC alleges both TracFone and its sales agents benefited from this conduct.&nbsp; The agents earned money by fabricating the new enrollments and TracFone benefited by receiving Lifeline support subsidies by submitting claims for the fabricated enrollments.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The investigation supporting this NAL originated from a referral by USAC based on NLAD.\u00a0 In May 2018, USAC identified a group of claims made by TracFone that were potentially fraudulent or erroneous duplicates of existing Florida subscribers. In August 2018, similar issues were reported by the Public Utility Commission of Texas. By September of 2018, the FCC\u2019s Enforcement Bureau had sent an administrative subpoena, or Letter of Inquiry (LOI), to TracFone regarding the suspect claims.\u00a0 Before responding in writing to the LOI, TracFone submitted to USAC an amended reimbursement claims and returned $101,143 in Lifeline disbursements for the ineligible Florida subscribers detected by USAC.\u00a0 In the interim, USAC determined that TracFone appeared to have over-claimed $229,483 in federal Lifeline support for Texas subscribers in 2018.\u00a0 TracFone returned another $1,171,611 to USAC on amended reimbursement claims for Texas customers during 2018 but prior to its LOI response.\u00a0 TracFone later admitted in LOI Responses that its sales agents fabricated enrollment data resulting in TracFone apparently receiving Lifeline support for these fictitious or duplicate subscribers contrary to the Communication Act and FCC Rules.\u00a0 The FCC supported the fine of $6,013,000 by applying a \u201cforfeiture methodology in Lifeline cases designed to address and deter waste, fraud, and abuse by careless or manipulative ETCs seeking federal funds to which they are not entitled.\u201d\u00a0 It was also based on TracFone\u2019s LOI admission, which carries a federal perjury certification. \u00a0The base forfeiture began at $5,738,000. An upward adjustment of $275,000 was made by the FCC to that base forfeiture for TracFone\u2019s Florida conduct.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>Takeaways: <\/strong>In recent years, Lifeline waste and misuse has been a top priority of the FCC and its Commissioners.\u00a0 This is for two reasons. One is that these subsidy funds originate in USF contributions remitted by contributing carries from end-user regulatory fees &#8211; a regulatory fee collection that is heavily enforced with the carriers. Second is that waste and misuse plagued the Lifeline Fund for many years.\u00a0 To combat waste and misuse, the FCC initiated the NLAD system and reinforced its efforts by USAC to detect fraudulent claims with all federally subsidized communication services mandated for the public benefit. \u00a0\u00a0Maldonado Law has seen this first hand.\u00a0 We have represented numerous clients, both ETC and ISO, in multiple investigations and enforcement actions involving erroneous or suspect Lifeline, Rural Healthcare, Schools and Libraries, and TRS subsidy claims.\u00a0 This has not included only the Enforcement Bureau but also the FCC\u2019s Office of Inspector General for potential referral to the DOJ under the Federal False Claims Act. Indeed, the FCC is taking these ETC cases quite serious these days. \u00a0<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>For FCC practitioners, the TracFone NAL should have been the stuff of a Request for Consent Decree Negotiations while in the investigation phase and prior to LOI Response.\u00a0 Such a Request stood to have an impact on the base fine and upward adjustment issued by the FCC.\u00a0 The issue really boils down to a lack on effective monitoring of sales agents by the ETC, not a concerted plan to submit false claims. Many ETCs are plagued with this problem by the very nature of the sales channel.\u00a0 In-person or one-on-one contact must be established by the sales agent to qualify sign the subscriber up.\u00a0 If the sales person is independent and incentive purely by commissions, and additionally is not under heavy compliance scrutiny by the ETC (through electronic cross checks or otherwise), then the recipe is ripe for NALs of this nature.\u00a0\u00a0 <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Prevention is the best medicine.\u00a0 If anything can be taken away from the NAL woes of TracFone here, it is that unless an ETC\u2019s sales agents are employees then a constant compliance eye must be kept on them.\u00a0 It is a far better scenario for the ETC to discover the potential fraud by sales agents first, inform USAC that amended Lifeline reimbursement claims will be forthcoming because of the discovery, and return erroneous claims as they are verified, then to be blindsided by groups of anomalies on NLAD referred to the Enforcement Bureau for enforcement.\u00a0 Remember, ETCs are responsible for this compliance solely.\u00a0 USAC has no obligation to give a &#8220;heads-up&#8221; on anything submitted to NLAD.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>By: Edward A. Maldonado, Esq. May 24, 2020 Coral Gables, Florida \u2013 Categories FCC Practice FCC ALERT: FCC Eligible Telecommunications Carriers (ETC) under 47 U.S.C \u00a7 214(e) who use independent sales agents or Independent Sales Offices (ISOs) for registration and sign-up of low-income Lifeline subscribers, or, have had issues with claims submitted to USAC and &hellip; <\/p>\n<p class=\"link-more\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading<span class=\"screen-reader-text\"> &#8220;Who Got Whacked and Why?   Lifeline Program Violations&#8221;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":466,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[26,13,12],"tags":[67,72,28,68,73,29,31,66,71,69,27,77,70,76,75,74],"class_list":["post-465","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-fcc-enforcement-actions","category-fcc-practice","category-telecom-voip","tag-eligible-telecommunications-carrier","tag-fcc-consent-decree","tag-fcc-enforcement","tag-fcc-etc","tag-fcc-federal-subsidy","tag-fcc-fines","tag-fcc-forfeiture","tag-fcc-lifeline-program","tag-fcc-loi","tag-fcc-low-income-program","tag-fcc-nal","tag-fcc-usf","tag-lifeline-misuse-and-waste","tag-telecommunication-regulatory-fees","tag-universal-service-fund","tag-usac"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v26.2 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Who Got Whacked and Why?  Lifeline Program Violations - Maldonado Law Group<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Who Got Whacked and Why?  Lifeline Program Violations - Maldonado Law Group\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"By: Edward A. Maldonado, Esq. May 24, 2020 Coral Gables, Florida \u2013 Categories FCC Practice FCC ALERT: FCC Eligible Telecommunications Carriers (ETC) under 47 U.S.C \u00a7 214(e) who use independent sales agents or Independent Sales Offices (ISOs) for registration and sign-up of low-income Lifeline subscribers, or, have had issues with claims submitted to USAC and &hellip; Continue reading &quot;Who Got Whacked and Why?  Lifeline Program Violations&quot;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Maldonado Law Group\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2020-05-25T02:17:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Who-Got-Whacked-Why-ETC-Lifeline-Program.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"296\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"271\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Maldonado Law\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Maldonado Law\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/\",\"name\":\"Who Got Whacked and Why? Lifeline Program Violations - Maldonado Law Group\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Who-Got-Whacked-Why-ETC-Lifeline-Program.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2020-05-25T02:17:11+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/13e81aa07c65cbe9a689e2e20bc7ffe2\"},\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Who-Got-Whacked-Why-ETC-Lifeline-Program.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Who-Got-Whacked-Why-ETC-Lifeline-Program.jpg\",\"width\":296,\"height\":271},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Who Got Whacked and Why? Lifeline Program Violations\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/\",\"name\":\"Maldonado Law Group\",\"description\":\"Edward A. Maldonado, Esq.\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/13e81aa07c65cbe9a689e2e20bc7ffe2\",\"name\":\"Maldonado Law\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3c55a27c0cda9c74312677fca40402f0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3c55a27c0cda9c74312677fca40402f0?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Maldonado Law\"},\"description\":\"Edward A. Maldonado is a leading Florida telecommunications and FCC attorney with over 25 years of experience. Since founding Maldonado Law Group, he has successfully assisted more than 500 companies with FCC licensure and regulatory compliance. His practice focuses on complex telecommunications law, TCPA defense, federal litigation, and emerging technology regulations. A recognized authority in communications law, Ed contributed to drafting the Illinois Phone Card Fraud Act and served as the founding author of \\\"Legal Line,\\\" a regular legal column in The Prepaid Press. He has successfully defended numerous high-stakes cases, including reducing a $252,000 TCPA fine to $20,000 and securing dismissal of a $12 million claim against a sovereign state. Admitted to the Florida Bar in 1997 and the U.S. 11th Circuit Federal Bar in 1999, Ed holds a J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of Law with a certificate in International and Comparative Law. He provides bilingual services in English and Spanish, representing clients throughout Florida and nationwide. Based in Coral Gables, Ed leads a team of experienced attorneys serving telecommunications carriers, broadcasters, internet companies, and marketing firms in regulatory compliance, federal litigation, and technology law matters.\",\"sameAs\":[\"http:\/\/www.maldonado-group.com\"],\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/author\/maldonado-law\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Who Got Whacked and Why?  Lifeline Program Violations - Maldonado Law Group","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Who Got Whacked and Why?  Lifeline Program Violations - Maldonado Law Group","og_description":"By: Edward A. Maldonado, Esq. May 24, 2020 Coral Gables, Florida \u2013 Categories FCC Practice FCC ALERT: FCC Eligible Telecommunications Carriers (ETC) under 47 U.S.C \u00a7 214(e) who use independent sales agents or Independent Sales Offices (ISOs) for registration and sign-up of low-income Lifeline subscribers, or, have had issues with claims submitted to USAC and &hellip; Continue reading \"Who Got Whacked and Why?  Lifeline Program Violations\"","og_url":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/","og_site_name":"Maldonado Law Group","article_published_time":"2020-05-25T02:17:11+00:00","og_image":[{"width":296,"height":271,"url":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Who-Got-Whacked-Why-ETC-Lifeline-Program.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Maldonado Law","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Maldonado Law","Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/","url":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/","name":"Who Got Whacked and Why? Lifeline Program Violations - Maldonado Law Group","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Who-Got-Whacked-Why-ETC-Lifeline-Program.jpg","datePublished":"2020-05-25T02:17:11+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/13e81aa07c65cbe9a689e2e20bc7ffe2"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Who-Got-Whacked-Why-ETC-Lifeline-Program.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/Who-Got-Whacked-Why-ETC-Lifeline-Program.jpg","width":296,"height":271},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/telecom-voip\/who-got-whacked-and-why-lifeline-program-violations\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Who Got Whacked and Why? Lifeline Program Violations"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/","name":"Maldonado Law Group","description":"Edward A. Maldonado, Esq.","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/13e81aa07c65cbe9a689e2e20bc7ffe2","name":"Maldonado Law","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en","@id":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3c55a27c0cda9c74312677fca40402f0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/3c55a27c0cda9c74312677fca40402f0?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Maldonado Law"},"description":"Edward A. Maldonado is a leading Florida telecommunications and FCC attorney with over 25 years of experience. Since founding Maldonado Law Group, he has successfully assisted more than 500 companies with FCC licensure and regulatory compliance. His practice focuses on complex telecommunications law, TCPA defense, federal litigation, and emerging technology regulations. A recognized authority in communications law, Ed contributed to drafting the Illinois Phone Card Fraud Act and served as the founding author of \"Legal Line,\" a regular legal column in The Prepaid Press. He has successfully defended numerous high-stakes cases, including reducing a $252,000 TCPA fine to $20,000 and securing dismissal of a $12 million claim against a sovereign state. Admitted to the Florida Bar in 1997 and the U.S. 11th Circuit Federal Bar in 1999, Ed holds a J.D. from Chicago-Kent College of Law with a certificate in International and Comparative Law. He provides bilingual services in English and Spanish, representing clients throughout Florida and nationwide. Based in Coral Gables, Ed leads a team of experienced attorneys serving telecommunications carriers, broadcasters, internet companies, and marketing firms in regulatory compliance, federal litigation, and technology law matters.","sameAs":["http:\/\/www.maldonado-group.com"],"url":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/author\/maldonado-law\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/465","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=465"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/465\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":469,"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/465\/revisions\/469"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/466"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=465"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=465"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.MALDONADO-GROUP.COM\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=465"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}